seekstone
Related Servers
Alternatives to seekstone
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server providing tools to interact with Obsidian via the Local REST API community plugin.5MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server to interact with Obsidian via the Local REST API community plugin.2134,490MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn Obsidian plugin that runs an embedded MCP server inside Obsidian, exposing vault operations and optional GitHub integration to any MCP client.8,850 npmGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for interacting with Obsidian via the Local REST API, enabling file operations, search, and content editing in your vault.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceThe fastest Obsidian MCP server for Claude.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server to interact with Obsidian via the Local REST API community plugin, enabling file listing, search, content manipulation, and note management.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 25 tools
Most tools have crisply distinct purposes, and descriptions actively steer selection (query_notes 'use this instead of search when filtering by properties', context_pack 'use search to locate notes'). The residual overlaps — read_note vs read_notes, append_note vs patch_note's append op vs append_periodic_note, search vs query_notes vs context_pack — are explained but still require reading the descriptions to pick correctly.
Uniform snake_case with a verb-first pattern (list_*, get_*, read_*, create_*, move_*, update_*, patch_*, append_*, delete_*, rename_*) used consistently across notes, tasks, links, periodic notes, and the write journal. The only bare-verb tools (search, undo_write) are self-explanatory and don't break the pattern.
25 tools sits at the heavy end of the range for an Obsidian vault server. Several are convenience variants of one another (read_note/read_notes, search/query_notes/context_pack, append_note/patch_note/append_periodic_note, get_periodic_note), so the surface is broader than strictly necessary even though each tool maps to a real workflow.
Strong lifecycle coverage: read/create/append/move/delete, section and frontmatter patching, full-text and metadata search, task listing/state changes, backlinks/outlinks, periodic notes, and a journaled undo system that covers reverts of every write. Minor gaps remain — no folder-level operations (create/move/delete folders, listing folder structure), no batch multi-note edits, and no template listing despite template-based creation.