With only a single tool in the set, there is no possibility of tool-to-tool confusion; the agent has exactly one entry point. The internal mode parameter (choice/score/noul) is well documented, so even the intra-tool variation is clear.

One tool named 'advise' is trivially consistent — a clean, lowercase verb with no competing conventions to clash against. There is no naming pattern to violate.

A single 'advise' tool with modes is a defensible design for wrapping one decision model, since the modes are variants of the same operation rather than genuinely distinct resources. It is slightly thin, but not a mismatch with the server's stated scope.

The core advisory surface (categorical choice, ordered score, and binary proposition) is covered, but there is no way to report outcomes back for calibration, request explanations, or batch multiple questions. These are notable gaps for a decision-support domain, though agents can still function.