Skip to main content
Glama
shanmukha-here

AgentRoots

by shanmukha-here
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to AgentRoots

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • trw-mcp

      wallter
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server providing persistent engineering memory and spec-driven development workflows for AI coding agents, preserving learnings across sessions.
      41
      603 PyPI
      Business Source 1.1

    • Continuum MCP Server

      pouyahasanamreji
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Shared memory and orchestration for coding agents, enabling persistent knowledge, multi-agent coordination, and a canonical workflow across MCP-compatible AI clients.
      9 npm
      110
      -

    • HYTHE

      hythe-dev
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets multiple AI coding agents share state, preserve context across sessions, and coordinate via a knowledge graph, messaging, and branch-preserving checkpoint/resume with conflict handling.
      42 npm
      Apache 2.0

    • Cortex OS

      qi-mouren
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides AI agents with persistent memory, cross-agent sharing, and context management, enabling them to remember conversations, track complex tasks, and evolve skills across tools.
      2
      MIT

    • MegaMemory

      0xK3vin
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets coding agents build and query a persistent knowledge graph of concepts, architecture, and decisions, enabling them to remember across sessions.
      194 npm
      564
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose: context retrieval, frontier scanning, querying, record fetching, validation, proposal creation, lifecycle review, evidence linking, and synchronization. There is no overlap or ambiguity between tool functions.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools consistently use the 'research_' prefix with a clear verb_noun pattern (e.g., get_context, link_evidence, validate). The naming is uniform, predictable, and follows a standard convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine tools is well-scoped for a research project management server, covering the core lifecycle without redundancies. The number falls comfortably within the ideal range and each tool serves a necessary function.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers creation (propose), lifecycle management (review), evidence linking, querying, validation, and sync, which addresses the main workflows. However, there is no explicit update or delete tool, so direct modification of record content is not exposed; the review and propose tools may handle this indirectly via versioning.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources