llauncher
Related Servers
Alternatives to llauncher
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceManages a local fleet of llama.cpp GGUF models, enabling AI agents to discover, start, stop, test, and query evaluation results for llama-server processes.69 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to scan local GGUF models, estimate VRAM and suggest GPU offload layers, manage llama-server lifecycle, and proxy OpenAI-format chats with idle auto-unload.9MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceManages dev server lifecycles for AI coding agents, providing structured process awareness, health checks, and JSON outputs to prevent panic cycles.MIT
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that connects LLM agents to a local LM Studio instance, enabling model management, OpenAI-compatible chat completions, text completions, and embeddings through a set of tools.91-

LocalAiMCPofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables natural-language control of a LocalAI server, exposing its full API as MCP tools for model management, inference, monitoring, media processing, and advanced system operations.MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to discover, configure, and manage local development servers. Provides tools for app registration, port allocation, lifecycle control, and log access without manual config editing.232 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 15 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: model CRUD, server lifecycle (start/stop/swap/cancel), monitoring (status/logs/metrics/slots), and orphan detection. Even closely related tools like server_metrics and server_slots are well-differentiated by their descriptions and sensitivity levels.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using lowercase snake_case (e.g., add_model, start_server, list_orphans). The naming is predictable and intuitive, with no mixed conventions.
With 15 tools, the server covers model configuration, server lifecycle, monitoring, and utility functions like validation. The count is well-scoped for the domain—not too sparse to leave gaps, nor too bloated with redundant tools.
The tool surface provides complete CRUD for models, full server lifecycle (start, stop, swap, cancel), comprehensive monitoring (status, logs, metrics, slots, orphans), and validation. No obvious gaps prevent an agent from managing llama-server processes effectively.