Skip to main content
Glama
shanejonas

openrpc-mpc-server

by shanejonas

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
rpc_callC

Call any JSON-RPC method on a server with parameters. A user would prompt: Call method on with params

rpc_discoverB

This uses JSON-RPC to call rpc.discover which is part of the OpenRPC Specification for discovery for JSON-RPC servers. A user would prompt: What JSON-RPC methods does this server have?

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

B3.3/5.0

Scored across 2 tools

Disambiguation5/5

The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: rpc_call is for executing arbitrary JSON-RPC methods, while rpc_discover is specifically for server discovery to list available methods. There is no overlap in functionality, making them easy to distinguish.

Naming Consistency5/5

Both tools follow a consistent 'rpc_' prefix pattern with descriptive suffixes (call, discover), using snake_case throughout. This provides a predictable and readable naming convention across the tool set.

Tool Count3/5

With only 2 tools, the server feels minimal but appropriate for its narrow scope of JSON-RPC interaction. However, it lacks tools for common operations like server health checks or parameter validation, which could enhance usability in this domain.

Completeness3/5

The tools cover the core actions of calling methods and discovering server capabilities, which aligns with the OpenRPC domain. However, there are notable gaps such as error handling tools, batch request support, or schema validation that would provide more comprehensive coverage for JSON-RPC workflows.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessUnresponsive