shakatoti1618-agent
Related Servers
Alternatives to shakatoti1618-agent
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that enables AI agents to perform GitHub operations like creating repositories, issues, and commits through natural language.-
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that lets AI agents interact with GitHub using natural language, supporting operations like creating repositories, issues, and commits.5-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI agents to directly manage GitHub repositories, including PRs, issues, and code search, using natural language.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that exposes GitHub operations as tools for AI agents, enabling code search, issue management, and PR review.12MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that wraps the GitHub REST API into tools for repo queries, issue/PR management, code review, search, and authentication, letting coding agents operate GitHub directly in conversations.1 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceA MCP server that bridges LLMs with GitHub repository management, enabling automated analysis of pull requests, issue management, tag creation, and release management through natural language.526Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: repository creation, issue creation, repository listing, commit creation, issue listing, issue closing, pull request creation, and commit listing. There is no overlap or ambiguity between tool purposes.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: create_repository, create_issue, list_repositories, create_commit, list_issues, close_issue, create_pull_request, list_commits. The convention is uniform, with singular nouns after 'create' and plural nouns after 'list'.
With 8 tools, the server is well-scoped for GitHub operations. The count falls within the ideal 3-15 range, and each tool covers a distinct common task without redundancy.
The tool set covers core creation and listing workflows for repositories, issues, commits, and pull requests, plus closing issues. However, it lacks common operations such as updating issues (beyond closing), merging pull requests, and getting single-item details, leaving notable gaps in lifecycle coverage.