Inxmail MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Inxmail MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Mailtarget that exposes tools to discover and call management API endpoints and send transactional emails via the Transmission API.6 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables sending transactional email and campaigns, managing contacts and templates, and reading delivery reports and wallet usage from any MCP client.MIT
- MIT

MailPace MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseDqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server implementation that allows sending emails over MailPace's fast transactional email API.11MIT
xmit-mcpofficial
FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceRemote MCP server for the Transmit email platform, enabling email sending, contact management, template and campaign operations via natural language.-
lingtai-whatsappofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceMCP server for interacting with the official Meta WhatsApp Business Platform/Cloud API, enabling sending messages, managing contacts, templates, and handling webhook callbacks.Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 29 tools
Tools are clearly distinguished by email pipeline (relay vs. event-triggered) and operation type, with excellent cross-referencing in descriptions (e.g., 'use X instead of Y'). Minor overlap exists between composite checkers (check_email_blocked, check_email_delivery) and granular getters, but descriptions explicitly guide preferred usage.
Strict adherence to verb_noun snake_case throughout (add_to_blacklist, list_relay_bounces, mark_error_log_read). Vocabulary is consistent across parallel tool sets (relay vs. transactional variants use identical verb patterns), making the 29-tool surface predictable.
At 29 tools, the surface exceeds the ideal range and feels dense, though justified by the dual-pipeline domain (event-triggered vs. SMTP relay). The consistent naming patterns help manage the complexity, but the count approaches the threshold where agent selection becomes challenging.
Excellent lifecycle coverage for blacklists/blocklists and comprehensive monitoring (bounces, complaints, reactions, deliveries, error logs) across both email pipelines. Minor gaps include lack of single-item getters for bounces/complaints and no event type management (create/update), which appear to be admin-only functions.