spruthub_get_method_schema

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses the output contents (parameters, return type, examples), giving some behavioral context. However, it does not mention authentication, error cases, side effects, or safety guarantees, and no annotations exist to cover these aspects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that front-loads the action and resource, with no unnecessary words. It is concise and directly communicates the tool's core function.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the tool's purpose and partially explains the return content, but it lacks explicit guidance on when to use it relative to sibling tools and does not specify the return structure beyond listing included elements. Given the simple one-parameter interface, it is adequate but not enriched.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already provides complete coverage with a description and examples for methodName. The tool description adds no parameter-specific semantics, but the schema is sufficient on its own.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb 'Get' and a distinct resource 'detailed schema for a specific Sprut.hub API method'. It clearly differentiates this tool from siblings like spruthub_list_methods (which lists all methods) and spruthub_call_method (which invokes a method) by focusing on a single method's schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for retrieving a method's schema before calling it, but it does not explicitly state when to prefer this over spruthub_list_methods or how it relates to spruthub_call_method. No exclusions or alternative tools are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.