Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-starter

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      FastAPI Todo API with an MCP server for managing todos, deployable to Render, AWS App Runner, or ECS.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A simple MCP server for managing a todo list — add tasks, list tasks, and mark tasks complete. Built with the Python MCP SDK (FastMCP) as a hands-on learning project.
      -
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A template and demonstration project for building, testing, and deploying remote MCP servers using FastMCP and uv. It provides a foundational structure for creating MCP-compliant tools that can be hosted publicly and integrated with LLM agents.
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A multi-node todo application server using MCP protocol, Redis for storage, and OpenRouter for AI-powered prioritization analysis.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A demo MCP server exposing an in-memory todo list via tools (add_task, list_tasks, complete_task), a resource, and a prompt, over both stdio and HTTP transports.
      0
      ISC

    TDQS

    D1.5/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation4/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of inter-tool confusion or misselection. However, the complete absence of a description leaves some uncertainty about the tool's exact purpose and usage, slightly reducing clarity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool name 'greet' is a simple verb in lowercase, which is consistent with common MCP naming conventions. There is no second tool to create a naming pattern conflict.

    Tool Count1/5

    A single, undocumented 'greet' tool is an extreme mismatch for any meaningful server scope. The rubric explicitly treats a single trivial tool as a score of 1.

    Completeness1/5

    The server provides no lifecycle, CRUD, or domain-specific operations beyond a trivial greeting. This is a severely incomplete surface for any practical agent use case.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues