Skip to main content
Glama
shadmaanAsif

MCP Demo

by shadmaanAsif
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Demo

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-server-for-addition-tool

      barmanakash
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to perform addition calculations through a stdio-based MCP server with an add_numbers tool and type-safe validation.
      25 npm
      -

    • mcp-lab-00-raw-protocol

      lucas-moont
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables running a minimal MCP server over stdio that manually implements JSON-RPC, exposing an add tool so users can observe the handshake, tool listing, and tool call cycle without the official SDK.
      1
      MIT

    • MCP Demo

      VictorC55
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A model-agnostic MCP server exposing example tools (add1, multiply2, greet) for learning purposes, working with any LLM through stdio transport.
      -

    • yifanli-mcp-add-demo

      tryp0xy1us
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A minimal Model Context Protocol server that provides a simple tool for adding two integers. It serves as a demonstration of the official Python MCP SDK and is designed for local execution via stdio.
      1
      -

    • MCPServerL2

      Broflotsky
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables users to run a modular TypeScript MCP server that communicates over STDIO and exposes tools for summing numbers and greeting users.
      2
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only a single tool, there is no possibility of confusion or misselection between tools. The purpose (adding two numbers) is unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The lone tool 'add' uses a clear, simple verb, but with only one name there is no established convention to be consistent with. No violations exist, but the pattern is untestable.

    Tool Count2/5

    A single trivial tool is far too thin for any meaningful server scope, even a demo. The surface offers no room for a real workflow.

    Completeness2/5

    For an arithmetic domain, only addition is covered; subtraction, multiplication, and division are missing. Agents relying on this surface will hit dead ends for any non-additive task.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources