Skip to main content
Glama
shabiokscode

Appraisal Tracker MCP

by shabiokscode
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Appraisal Tracker MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Obsidian MCP Local

      HenriqueCSouzza
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search, read, create, and modify Markdown notes in local Obsidian vaults directly through filesystem operations. Supports tag-based discovery and frontmatter parsing without requiring Obsidian to be open, facilitating integration with VS Code Copilot via stdio transport.
      5
      9 npm
      4
      MIT

    • obsidian-dev-memory

      jmjava
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides AI coding assistants persistent engineering memory stored as Markdown files in an Obsidian vault, enabling project context retrieval, session capture, decision recording, and memory search without requiring Obsidian to be running.
      7
      1
      MIT

    • Recall

      jerrl10
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Turns AI coding conversations into structured Markdown notes in an Obsidian vault, and retrieves that knowledge in later sessions so assistants can reuse prior conclusions.
      5
      2
      MIT

    • bragdoc-mcp

      hmcc0
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Helps capture professional achievements using the STAR method through iterative interviews. Generates period summaries and performance review self-assessments.
      9
      8 npm
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: generating different outputs (report, summary, game plan), managing evidences (add, list, update image), and retrieving appraisal goals. No two tools overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow the verb_noun pattern consistently (e.g., generate_report, add_evidence, get_appraisal). The verbs are diverse but descriptive, and there is no mixing of naming conventions.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 7 tools, the server covers core workflows for an appraisal tracker without being bloated or insufficient. The number fits the domain well.

    Completeness3/5

    The tools cover adding and listing evidences, updating evidence images, and generating various reports. However, missing update/delete for evidences and any CRUD for appraisal goals (only get) leaves noticeable gaps for a complete lifecycle.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources