get_dca_bot_details

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description clearly implies a read-only operation via the verb 'Get' and states it returns details (configuration, deals, etc.). It does not explicitly declare non-destructiveness but is sufficiently transparent for a retrieval tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, using two sentences plus a clear list of args and returns. It is front-loaded with the main purpose, and every sentence adds value without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the output schema exists, the description adequately summarizes return values. It covers all input parameters but does not address error cases (e.g., invalid bot_id) or mention that the bot must exist. Still, it is fairly complete for a get operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, but the description explains all three parameters: bot_id as unique identifier, include_events with default False, and response_filter with valid values 'full' or 'display'. This adds essential meaning beyond the schema's names and types.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves comprehensive details for a specific DCA bot, using the verb 'Get' and specifying the resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like get_dca_bot_list (list all bots) and get_dca_bot_profit_data (profit metrics only) by focusing on detailed information.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description describes what the tool does and its parameters but provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_dca_bot_list or get_dca_bot_profit_data. It does not give explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use information.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.