get_contact
Retrieve a specific contact by providing its unique ID.
Instructions
Get a specific contact by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Contact ID |
Retrieve a specific contact by providing its unique ID.
Get a specific contact by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Contact ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description must disclose behavior. It implies a read operation but lacks details on error handling (e.g., if ID not found), response format, or authentication needs.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, efficient, and front-loaded with clear verb and resource. No unnecessary text.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple get by ID tool, the description is adequate but lacks information about return values or error states, especially since no output schema is provided.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with the id parameter described as 'Contact ID'. Description adds no extra meaning beyond schema, so baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (get), the resource (contact), and the method (by ID), distinguishing it from siblings like list_contacts (multiple) and other get tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., list_contacts for multiple). No prerequisites or context provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/seven-io/seven-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server