Skip to main content
Glama
sethbang

proton-mail-mcp

by sethbang

Related Servers

Alternatives to proton-mail-mcp

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to interact with Proton Drive files, supporting operations like listing, reading, creating, and deleting files and folders.
    7
    91 npm
    16
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Self-hosted MCP server that enables reading, sending, and automating Proton Mail via Bridge, with optional SimpleLogin alias management.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    An MCP server that reads, searches, organizes, and deletes Proton Mail through the local Proton Mail Bridge, with read-only mode and sender authentication checks. It cannot send mail.
    53 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables MCP clients to interact with Proton Mail through a self-hosted server that works alongside Proton Mail Bridge. It provides read-only mailbox tools such as listing folders, searching mail, and retrieving messages while keeping Bridge isolated from the network.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    MCP server for reading and searching Proton Mail via Proton Mail Bridge, providing tools to list mailboxes, list/search messages, and get message details with TLS certificate pinning.
    4
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A read-only MCP server that connects to Proton Mail via Proton Bridge, enabling AI assistants to search, list, and read emails securely without leaving your machine.
    4
    23 npm
    1
    MIT

TDQS

A4.2/5.0

Scored across 31 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but pairs like reply_email/reply_all_email and thread vs. single-message tools (move_thread/move_message) could cause minor confusion. Descriptions do a good job clarifying usage.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., create_folder, delete_message, update_message_flags). The naming convention is uniform across the entire set.

Tool Count3/5

At 31 tools, the set is larger than typical (3-15) but still justified by the breadth of email operations (folders, labels, messages, threads, bulk actions, stats, attachments). It feels slightly heavy but not excessive.

Completeness5/5

The tool surface covers all major email lifecycle operations: folder/label CRUD, message send/reply/forward/draft, move/delete (single and bulk), thread operations, search, stats, and attachments. No obvious gaps for core email tasks.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessUnresponsive