MCP Screenshot Server
범용 스크린샷 MCP
AI 어시스턴트에게 스크린샷 기능을 제공하는 MCP (Model Context Protocol) 서버입니다. Puppeteer를 통한 웹 페이지 캡처와 기본 OS 도구를 사용한 크로스 플랫폼 시스템 스크린샷 기능을 모두 지원합니다.
기능
웹 페이지 스크린샷 — 헤드리스 Chromium 브라우저를 사용하여 모든 공개 URL 캡처
크로스 플랫폼 시스템 스크린샷 — 기본 OS 도구(macOS
screencapture, Linuxmaim/scrot/gnome-screenshot등, Windows PowerShell+.NET)를 사용하여 전체 화면, 창 또는 영역 캡처보안 우선 설계 — SSRF 방지, 경로 탐색 보호, DNS 리바인딩 방어, 명령 주입 방지 및 DoS 제한
MCP 네이티브 — Claude Desktop, Cursor 및 모든 MCP 호환 클라이언트와 직접 통합
Related MCP server: Chrome DevTools MCP
요구 사항
Node.js >= 18.0.0
Chromium은 첫 실행 시 Puppeteer에 의해 자동으로 다운로드됩니다.
take_system_screenshot을 위한 플랫폼별 요구 사항
플랫폼 | 필수 도구 | 참고 |
macOS |
| 추가 설치 불필요 |
Linux | 다음 중 하나: | 전체 기능 지원을 위해 |
Windows |
| .NET |
Linux 설치 예시
# Ubuntu/Debian (recommended)
sudo apt install maim xdotool
# Fedora
sudo dnf install maim xdotool
# Arch Linux
sudo pacman -S maim xdotool
# Wayland (Sway, etc.)
sudo apt install grim설치 후 다음 명령어로 설정을 확인할 수 있습니다:
npx universal-screenshot-mcp --doctor이 명령은 호스트를 탐색하고 감지된 배포판에 맞춰 누락된 도구에 대한 복사/붙여넣기 가능한 설치 명령을 출력합니다.
빠른 시작
npm에서 설치
npm install -g universal-screenshot-mcp또는 npx로 직접 실행:
npx universal-screenshot-mcp소스에서 설치
git clone https://github.com/sethbang/mcp-screenshot-server.git
cd mcp-screenshot-server
npm install
npm run buildMCP 클라이언트 구성
MCP 클라이언트 구성에 서버를 추가하세요. Claude Desktop의 경우 ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json을 편집합니다:
{
"mcpServers": {
"screenshot-server": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "universal-screenshot-mcp"]
}
}
}소스에서 설치한 경우:
{
"mcpServers": {
"screenshot-server": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["/absolute/path/to/mcp-screenshot-server/build/index.js"]
}
}
}Claude Code의 경우 claude mcp add 명령으로 서버를 등록합니다:
# Project scope (current directory only)
claude mcp add screenshot-server -- npx -y universal-screenshot-mcp
# User scope (available across all projects)
claude mcp add --scope user screenshot-server -- npx -y universal-screenshot-mcp소스에서 설치한 경우:
claude mcp add screenshot-server -- node /absolute/path/to/mcp-screenshot-server/build/index.jsclaude mcp list로 서버 등록을 확인하거나, 세션 내에서 /mcp를 사용하여 실시간 상태를 확인하세요.
Cursor 또는 기타 MCP 클라이언트의 경우 해당 문서에서 동일한 구성을 참조하세요.
도구
서버는 두 가지 MCP 도구를 노출합니다:
take_screenshot
헤드리스 Puppeteer 브라우저를 통해 웹 페이지(또는 특정 요소)를 캡처합니다.
매개변수 | 유형 | 필수 | 설명 |
| string | ✅ | 캡처할 URL (http/https만 가능) |
| number | — | 뷰포트 너비 (1–3840) |
| number | — | 뷰포트 높이 (1–2160) |
| boolean | — | 전체 스크롤 가능한 페이지 캡처 |
| string | — | 특정 요소를 캡처하기 위한 CSS 선택자 |
| string | — | 캡처 전 해당 선택자를 대기 |
| number | — | 밀리초 단위 지연 (0–30000) |
| string | — | 출력 파일 경로 (기본값: |
예시 프롬프트:
1920x1080 크기로 https://example.com 스크린샷을 찍어줘
take_system_screenshot
기본 OS 도구를 사용하여 데스크톱, 특정 애플리케이션 창 또는 화면 영역을 캡처합니다. macOS, Linux, Windows에서 작동합니다.
매개변수 | 유형 | 필수 | 설명 |
| enum | ✅ |
|
| number | — | 창 모드를 위한 창 ID |
| string | — | 창 모드를 위한 앱 이름 (예: |
| object | — | 영역 모드를 위한 |
| number | — | 다중 모니터 설정을 위한 디스플레이 번호 |
| boolean | — | 캡처에 마우스 커서 포함 |
| enum | — |
|
| number | — | 초 단위 캡처 지연 (0–10) |
| string | — | 출력 파일 경로 (기본값: |
크로스 플랫폼 기능 지원
기능 | macOS | Linux | Windows |
전체 화면 | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
영역 | ✅ | ✅ (maim, scrot, grim, import) | ✅ |
이름별 창 | ✅ | ⚠️ X11 + xdotool | ⚠️ 최선 노력 |
ID별 창 | ✅ | ✅ X11 전용 | ⚠️ HWND |
다중 디스플레이 | ✅ | ⚠️ 도구 의존적 | ✅ |
커서 포함 | ✅ | ⚠️ 도구 의존적 | ⚠️ |
지연 | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
예시 프롬프트:
Safari 창의 시스템 스크린샷을 찍어줘
구성
환경 변수
변수 | 기본값 | 설명 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
출력 디렉토리
스크린샷은 기본적으로 ~/Documents/screenshots에 저장됩니다(SCREENSHOT_OUTPUT_DIR을 통해 구성 가능). 사용자 지정 출력 경로는 허용된 디렉토리 중 하나로 확인되어야 합니다:
디렉토리 | 설명 |
| 기본 출력 위치 (구성 가능) |
| 원래 기본 위치 |
| 사용자 다운로드 폴더 |
| 사용자 문서 폴더 |
| 시스템 임시 디렉토리 |
보안
이 서버는 다중 보안 강화 계층을 구현합니다:
ID | 위협 | 완화 조치 |
SEC-001 | SSRF / DNS 리바인딩 | 차단된 IP 범위에 대해 URL 검증; |
SEC-003 | 명령 주입 | 모든 하위 프로세스는 |
SEC-004 | 경로 탐색 |
|
SEC-005 | 서비스 거부 | 세마포어를 통해 동시 Puppeteer 인스턴스를 3개로 제한 |
자세한 내용은 docs/security.md를 참조하세요.
개발
스크립트
명령 | 설명 |
| TypeScript를 |
| 파일 변경 시 재컴파일 |
| 단위 테스트 (빠름, 완전히 모의됨) |
| 통합 테스트 (실제 DNS/파일시스템) |
| E2E 테스트 (실제 Puppeteer/기본 도구) |
| 모든 테스트 계층 통합 |
| Docker를 통한 Linux e2e (Docker 필요) |
| 감시 모드에서 테스트 실행 |
| 커버리지 보고서와 함께 테스트 실행 |
| ESLint로 소스 린트 |
| 디버깅을 위한 MCP Inspector 실행 |
프로젝트 구조
src/
├── index.ts # Entry point — stdio transport
├── server.ts # MCP server factory
├── config/
│ ├── index.ts # Static constants (limits, allowed dirs)
│ └── runtime.ts # Singleton semaphore, default directory
├── tools/
│ ├── take-screenshot.ts # Web page capture tool
│ └── take-system-screenshot.ts # macOS system capture tool
├── types/
│ └── index.ts # Shared TypeScript interfaces
├── utils/
│ ├── helpers.ts # Response builders, file utilities
│ ├── screenshot-provider.ts # Cross-platform provider interface + factory
│ ├── macos-provider.ts # macOS: screencapture wrapper
│ ├── linux-provider.ts # Linux: maim/scrot/gnome-screenshot/etc.
│ ├── windows-provider.ts # Windows: PowerShell + .NET System.Drawing
│ ├── macos.ts # Window ID lookup via CoreGraphics
│ └── semaphore.ts # Async concurrency limiter
└── validators/
├── path.ts # Output path validation (SEC-004)
└── url.ts # URL/SSRF validation (SEC-001)테스트
테스트는 Vitest를 사용하여 세 계층으로 수행됩니다:
단위 (
npm test) — 전체 의존성 주입, 실제 I/O 없음. 빠른 피드백 루프.통합 (
npm run test:integration) — 실제 DNS 확인, 임시 디렉토리가 있는 실제 파일시스템, 로컬 HTTP 서버에 대한 실제 Puppeteer.E2E (
npm run test:e2e) — 실제 기본 스크린샷 도구. macOS 테스트는 네이티브로 실행; Linux 테스트는npm run test:linux를 통해 Docker에서 실행.
npm test # Unit tests (~300ms)
npm run test:linux # Linux provider tests in Docker
npm run test:all # EverythingMCP Inspector로 디버깅
npm run inspector이 명령은 빌드된 서버에 연결된 MCP Inspector를 실행하여 도구를 대화형으로 호출할 수 있게 합니다.
라이선스
Apache-2.0 — Copyright 2026 Seth Bang
Available Tools
2 toolstake_screenshotB
Capture web page or element via headless browser. Saves to ~/Documents/screenshots by default (configurable via SCREENSHOT_OUTPUT_DIR env var).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | Yes | URL to capture | |
| width | No | Viewport width | |
| height | No | Viewport height | |
| fullPage | No | Capture full page | |
| selector | No | CSS selector for element | |
| waitForSelector | No | Wait for selector | |
| waitForTimeout | No | Delay in ms | |
| outputPath | No | Absolute path, or relative to home dir |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden but only mentions method and save location; it omits critical behavioral traits like destructiveness, permission needs, or return value.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two concise sentences: first states purpose, second details save behavior. Front-loaded and no wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Despite 8 parameters and no output schema, the description omits return value, error handling, and other essential context, leaving significant gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema covers all 8 parameters with descriptions, so baseline is 3. The description adds the default save path and env var override, providing marginal extra context.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses specific verb 'capture' and resource 'web page or element' with method 'via headless browser', clearly distinguishing it from sibling 'take_system_screenshot' which captures system screens.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage for web screenshots but does not explicitly state when to use versus alternatives, nor does it mention prerequisites or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
take_system_screenshotA
Capture desktop, window, or region screenshot. Cross-platform: macOS (screencapture), Linux (maim/scrot/gnome-screenshot/etc.), Windows (PowerShell+.NET). Saves to ~/Documents/screenshots by default (configurable via SCREENSHOT_OUTPUT_DIR env var). For window mode, provide windowName (app name like "Safari") or windowId.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| mode | Yes | fullscreen=entire screen, window=specific app (requires windowName or windowId), region=coordinates | |
| windowId | No | Window ID (for window mode) | |
| windowName | No | App name like "Safari", "Firefox" (for window mode) | |
| region | No | Region {x,y,width,height} | |
| display | No | Display number | |
| includeCursor | No | Include cursor | |
| format | No | Image format (png or jpg) | |
| delay | No | Delay seconds | |
| outputPath | No | Absolute path, or relative to home dir |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full burden. It discloses the default save location and cross-platform tool dependencies but does not mention return behavior (e.g., file path or binary), permission requirements, or failure modes.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is concise with 4 sentences, front-loading the main action. It effectively uses bullet-like information for cross-platform details and mode instructions, though it could be slightly more structured.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given 9 parameters including a nested object and no output schema, the description covers default directory and platform support but omits return value, error handling, and comparison with the sibling tool. It is adequate but not fully complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds minor value by specifying default output directory and that windowName is an app name, but the schema already describes all parameters adequately.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Capture desktop, window, or region screenshot' with specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from the sibling tool 'take_screenshot' by specifying cross-platform support and modes.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides clear context for when to use each mode (fullscreen, window, region) and gives examples for window mode. However, it lacks guidance on when not to use this tool versus the sibling 'take_screenshot', missing explicit exclusion or alternative differentiation.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
2 tool updates
v1.2.0- Changed
take_screenshot10 fields changed- added
Input schema / $schemaAdded value: +"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#" - added
Input schema / additionalPropertiesAdded value: +false - changed
Input schema / properties / fullPage / descriptionPrevious value: -"Capture full scrollable page"New value: +"Capture full page" - changed
Input schema / properties / height / descriptionPrevious value: -"Viewport height in pixels"New value: +"Viewport height" - changed
Input schema / properties / outputPath / descriptionPrevious value: -"Custom output path (optional)"New value: +"Absolute path, or relative to home dir" - added
Input schema / properties / selectorAdded value: +{ + "description": "CSS selector for element", + "type": "string" +} - changed
Input schema / properties / url / descriptionPrevious value: -"URL to capture (can be http://, https://, or file:///)"New value: +"URL to capture" - added
Input schema / properties / waitForSelectorAdded value: +{ + "description": "Wait for selector", + "type": "string" +} - added
Input schema / properties / waitForTimeoutAdded value: +{ + "description": "Delay in ms", + "maximum": 30000, + "minimum": 0, + "type": "number" +} - changed
Input schema / properties / width / descriptionPrevious value: -"Viewport width in pixels"New value: +"Viewport width"
- Added
take_system_screenshot
1 tool update
- First observed
take_screenshot
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools are clearly distinct: one captures web pages/elements via headless browser, the other captures desktop/system screenshots. There is no overlap in functionality.
Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case (take_screenshot, take_system_screenshot), using the same 'take_' prefix.
Only 2 tools for a screenshot server is minimal but still covers the core use cases. More tools might be expected for management or configuration, but the count is not severely inadequate.
The tool set covers the primary screenshot domains (web and system). Minor gaps exist, such as listing or deleting screenshots, but core functionality is well-covered.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Browserless MCP — wraps the Browserless headless-Chromium REST API (browserless.io)
Screenshot any URL/HTML as PNG/JPEG/WebP, or read it as clean Markdown/text for LLMs.
Clean PNG/JPEG screenshots via REST or MCP, with goal-driven multi-step navigation.
Screenshot, PDF, OG-image, and page extraction (markdown/JSON) over MCP. Bearer key or x402.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceCaptures screenshots of web pages using Puppeteer, allowing AI agents to visually verify web applications and see their progress when generating web apps.557MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI coding assistants to control and inspect a live Chrome browser through Chrome DevTools. Provides browser automation, performance analysis, debugging capabilities, and network request monitoring.1,060,051 npm53,197Apache 2.0
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceEnables taking screenshots of web pages with support for multiple devices (desktop, mobile, tablet), custom dimensions, full-page capture, and various image formats. Built with Playwright for reliable web page rendering and screenshot generation.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to capture any public URL as PNG, JPEG, or PDF via REST API or MCP tools, including screenshot capture, page description, and PDF rendering.10 npmMIT