Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to paraph-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server for PDF form filling, basic editing, and OCR text extraction. It enables users to merge, rotate, annotate, and sign PDFs, while also supporting text extraction from both searchable and scanned image-based documents.
      3
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for electronic consignment notes (eCMR). Create, sign, manage, and track electronic transport documents with QR codes, PDF generation, and digital signatures through the Cargoffer ECMR API. Designed for AI agents like Claude Desktop, Cursor, and Cline.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables users to create, manage, and track electronic signing requests and templates through Claude Desktop and other MCP-compatible clients. Provides multi-tenant authentication with customer API keys for secure document workflow operations.
      66 npm
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      MCP server for Dashform (getaiform.com) - create and manage AI-powered forms, quizzes, and surveys. Supports form creation, response collection, analytics, and AI-driven form building with 15 tools across form management, response handling, and AI operations.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      E-signature for AI agents. An MCP server that lets Claude Code, Cursor, Zed, or any MCP-aware agent prepare, send, track, and seal legally binding documents without a human ever touching a mouse.
      6 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose targeting specific resources and actions: account info, template operations (get/list), and request operations (create/get/list/cancel). No overlap exists between tools, making it easy for an agent to select the correct one.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun naming pattern (e.g., get_account, list_templates, create_request). The verbs are appropriate and predictable, with no deviations in style or convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 7 tools, this server is well-scoped for its PDF and e-signing domain. Each tool serves a clear purpose, covering account management, template handling, and request lifecycle without being overly sparse or bloated.

    Completeness5/5

    The toolset provides complete CRUD/lifecycle coverage for the domain: account info (get), templates (list/get), and requests (create/get/list/cancel). It supports fill-only and e-signing workflows with no obvious gaps, ensuring agents can handle end-to-end processes.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues