Twitter MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Twitter MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceChecks a social post against a platform's real character limit before it ships — X bills every URL at 23 characters and weights non-Latin script at 2, while Bluesky and Mastodon count grapheme clusters. Covers X, X Premium, Bluesky, LinkedIn, Threads, Mastodon, and Discord, with no credentials and no network access.3457 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides tools for AI models to count characters and words in text, supporting English and other space-delimited languages.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with X (Twitter) to post tweets, threads, and replies while retrieving tweet metrics and account information. It supports core management tasks like deleting tweets and verifying authentication through the Twitter API.MIT

OpenTweet MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvides 30 tools to post, schedule, thread, and analyze X (Twitter) content, including AI media generation and multi-account management. No X developer account or OAuth setup required.3094 npmMIT- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAccurately counts characters, bytes, and manuscript paper based on Unicode grapheme clusters, and provides deterministic feedback to help AI meet exact length limits for self-introductions or school records.-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceProvides 14+ character-level text analysis tools that give LLMs the ability to accurately count letters, analyze individual characters, and work with text at the character level—overcoming tokenization limitations.1413 npm3MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no overlap: character counting, entity extraction, optimization, and validation. The descriptions specify unique functions, making it easy for an agent to select the right tool without confusion.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., count_tweet_characters, extract_entities, optimize_tweet, validate_tweet). This uniformity enhances readability and predictability across the set.
With 4 tools, the count is reasonable for a Twitter utility server, though slightly lean. It covers core text processing tasks but could benefit from additional tools like posting or analytics for a more comprehensive scope.
The tools provide good coverage for tweet analysis and preparation, but there are notable gaps for a Twitter server, such as missing CRUD operations (e.g., create_tweet, get_timeline) or interaction features (e.g., like, retweet). This limits the server's utility for full Twitter workflows.