No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 14 tools
Each tool maps to a distinct resource+action pair, and the list/detail pairs (pn_services/pn_service, pn_search_projects/pn_project, pn_search_freelancers/pn_profile) are spelled out in the descriptions. The closest pair, pn_market vs pn_trend, is explicitly split into current snapshot vs historical sampling, and pn_bids is clearly separated from bid statistics inside pn_project. Cross-references ('Next: pn_reviews, pn_portfolios') actively steer the agent to the right follow-up tool.
Every tool carries the same pn_ prefix in snake_case and follows a stable convention: search_<plural> for searches, bare singular noun for single-entity getters, and plural nouns for lists. There is no style drift (no camelCase, no stray verbs), so names are predictable from first glance.
Fourteen tools sit in the well-scoped range and each covers a genuinely different surface (projects, freelancers, profiles, bids, reviews, portfolios, services, skills, categories, market, trend). No obvious filler or redundant tool is present, and the navigation tools (pn_skills, pn_categories) are justified because they feed filter parameters elsewhere.
The surface is broad and coherent for a read-only marketplace research server: discovery, detail, reputation, portfolios, pricing analytics and trend history are all covered with no dead ends. Minor gaps remain, such as no way to search employers directly or to list a single freelancer's bids/submissions, though agents can work around these via pn_user_projects and pn_bids.