Seonix SEO MCP
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to Seonix SEO MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants and coding agents to audit, compare, and optimize websites for performance, SEO, AEO, GEO, and AI crawler accessibility directly from chat or development workflows.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables auditing, comparing, and optimizing websites for AI readiness, performance, SEO, AEO, GEO, and AI crawler accessibility.4MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceProvides AI-visibility scoring and site auditing capabilities for websites, enabling agents to check how sites appear in AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity, run full SEO/security audits, and monitor changes over time.15136 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to crawl live websites, audit AEO readiness, generate Schema.org @graph JSON-LD, llms.txt, ai.txt, and robots.txt, inject structured data into HTML, validate optimizations, and retrieve framework-specific code snippets.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to perform instant SEO audits, check robots.txt, sitemaps, and AI crawler access for any URL without API keys.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to crawl and audit websites for SEO issues, returning structured JSON reports with errors, warnings, and key statistics.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct role: site-wide audit, per-page fix proposal, dry-run preview, and speed-only audit. No overlapping purposes; an agent can easily select the appropriate tool.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (audit_site, preview_fix, propose_fixes, speed_audit). No mixing of conventions or ambiguous verbs.
Four tools is appropriate for an SEO analysis MCP server: site audit, fix proposal, fix preview, and speed audit. The scope is focused and each tool earns its place.
The tool set covers the full analysis workflow: comprehensive audit, targeted fix proposals, safety preview, and speed-specific audit. No obvious gaps given the read-only advisory nature.