Skip to main content
Glama
sentinelsignal

Sentinel Signal MCP

Official
by sentinelsignal
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Sentinel Signal MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • FHIR MCP Server

      jcafazzo
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server that bridges AI applications with FHIR healthcare data systems, enabling patient data access, clinical data retrieval, and data quality assessment.
      4
      -

    • claims-coverage-assessment

      ayushgupta94
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that reviews insurance claims against policy documents, providing coverage decisions, policy clause retrieval, claim history lookup, coverage rule checks, and fraud risk scoring via four tools.
      -

    • CodeWeaver

      adithyx-0
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that reads a clinical note and returns ranked ICD-10-CM diagnosis code candidates with clinical reasoning, validated against official CMS coding constraints.
      2
      9 npm
      MIT

    • Insurance Claims Assistant

      youssefmkb
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that processes car insurance claims by extracting structured data from raw accident reports, classifying severity using a two-model judge pipeline, and generating broker notifications.
      -

    • Claim Pilot MCP Server

      nucreaxion
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for insurance claim pilot tools, providing policy search, claim lookup, and fraud score calculation.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are mostly distinct, but score_workflow and score_batch both deal with scoring and could be confused without careful reading of their descriptions. get_usage and get_limits are also related but easily differentiated.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent lowercase verb_noun pattern (get_, score_, submit_, list_, validate_). This makes the set highly predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 8 tools, the server covers scoring (single and batch), validation, schema retrieval, workflow listing, feedback, usage, and limits. This is well-scoped for the API's purpose.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the main lifecycle of workflow scoring: single/batch scoring, validation, schema, workflow list, feedback, and account info. A minor gap might be a tool to retrieve historical scoring results, but this is likely handled by the score responses themselves.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources