Skip to main content
Glama
sentien-labs

VerdictSwarm MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to VerdictSwarm MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Real-time smart contract security for autonomous AI agents, offering tools for contract verification, wallet monitoring, drain detection, threat reporting, and leaderboards.
      19
      7 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides post-deploy Solana threat intelligence, enabling AI agents to check operators, tokens, and network stats for detecting rug pulls and malicious activity.
      5
      16 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Token safety oracle for AI agents. Honeypot detection, 17 scam pattern checks, LP lock verification across 6 EVM chains. Score 0-100 with risk flags. ERC Token Safety Score standard.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for real-time Solana token risk analysis. Cross-references RugCheck.xyz, DexScreener, and GoPlus Security to generate three-layer reports: machine verdict → LLM analysis → raw on-chain evidence. Live on Solana mainnet with USDC micropayments ($0.02/audit). Give any AI agent the ability to check if a token is safe before trading.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents on Base to call a check_token_risk tool before trading, providing honeypot detection, LP-lock verification, brand impersonation checks, and live sell simulation across Uniswap V2/V3/V4 and Aerodrome with a clear risk score and should-trade decision.
      1
      143 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clear, distinct purpose: rug-pull check, pricing, quick score, report generation, full scan, and payment verification. No two tools overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow the verb_noun pattern consistently using snake_case (e.g., check_rug_risk, get_quick_score, scan_token). No mixing of conventions.

    Tool Count5/5

    6 tools is appropriate for a token risk assessment service, covering quick and full scans, specialized rug check, report generation, pricing, and payment verification. The scope is well-balanced.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the full workflow: pricing info, multiple risk assessment levels, report generation, and payment verification. No obvious missing operations for the stated domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive