Skip to main content
Glama
semenboss95-design

garant-mcp

by semenboss95-design
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to garant-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • laws

      Totopolis
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides local, offline semantic search across 24 Russian Federation legal codes using natural-language queries, with tools to retrieve full articles by identifier and list available codes.
      BSD 2-Clause "Simplified"

    • KriteriusMX

      G8olio
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to search and retrieve legal sources from Mexican and inter-American courts (SCJN, TFJA, DOF, Corte IDH) with complete citations and official links.
      MIT

    • kontragentpro-mcp

      kontragentpro
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Look up Russian companies by INN (tax ID) from Claude Desktop, Cursor or any MCP client: full company card, multi-year financials from official tax filings, bankruptcy and state-inspection history, trademarks and sanctions lists. Works without an API key — the anonymous free tier is enabled by default.
      5
      MIT

    • Law7 MCP

      mikhashev
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides AI assistants with up-to-date legal documents from official sources, enabling accurate legal information retrieval and analysis.
      18
      AGPL 3.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct resource or action: general search, table of contents, full document, single article, revision list, revision-on-date, practice search, and information-type tree. The only potentially overlapping pair (garant_document vs garant_article) is explicitly differentiated by scope and cost, while garant_search vs garant_practice is clearly separated by normative documents vs court practice.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share a consistent garant_ prefix and snake_case style, and most names are resource nouns such as document, article, revisions, kinds, toc, and practice. Minor deviations are garant_search as a verb, garant_toc as an abbreviation, and garant_revision_on_date as a noun phrase rather than a verb_noun pattern, so the scheme is predictable but not perfectly uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eight tools is well-scoped for a specialized legal-research server: there are no redundant tools, and the set covers search, retrieval, navigation, revision history, and court-practice search without bloat. Each tool has a clear role, and the count matches the stated purpose.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers the core workflow: search, TOC navigation, full-document retrieval, article-level citation, revision history, and revision-on-date lookup. The main gap is that no tool can return the verbatim text of a historical revision, which the description explicitly calls out, and practice search is deliberately limited to first-page results with client-side court filtering. These are documented limitations but can be worked around for most monitoring and citation tasks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources