A
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenanceBridges MCP clients to a self-hosted Vikunja instance, exposing tools for managing projects, tasks, labels, and comments.
16 npm
MIT
vikunja-mcp
by semaputnik
Related Servers
Alternatives to vikunja-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to read, create, close, and comment on Vikunja tasks, allowing agents to manage a project board autonomously.7MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with Vikunja task management instances through natural language. Supports comprehensive project and task operations including CRUD, assignments, labels, comments, relations, and attachments.3316 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceLightweight MCP server for Vikunja task management, providing tools to manage projects, tasks, labels, and comments via API.16 npmMIT
- AlicenseCqualityFmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with Vikunja task management instances, providing full task, project, label, team, user, and webhook management operations through subcommand-based tools.16146 npm109MIT
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with Vikunja task management instances, providing full task, project, label, and user management capabilities.17146 npmMIT
TDQS
A4.2/5.0
Scored across 11 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: tasks, projects, and labels are cleanly separated, and remove_task/restore_task are explicitly paired as opposites. There is no meaningful overlap between any two tools.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow a consistent lower_snake_case verb_noun pattern, such as list_tasks, get_task, update_task, and create_project. The naming is uniform and predictable across the whole set.
Tool Count5/5
Eleven tools is a well-scoped set for a task/project management server, covering tasks, projects, and labels without excessive fragmentation. Each tool earns its place in the API surface.
Completeness4/5
Task lifecycle coverage is strong with list/get/create/update/remove/restore and label manipulation. The main gap is project coverage, which supports list/get/create but lacks update/delete or archive operations, though these are less central to task-focused workflows.
Maintenance
ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues