openai-decisions-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to openai-decisions-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP agents to evaluate content against typed questions (yes/no, choice, or score) in a single parallel call.139 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables local read-only search and retrieval of approved, current evidence via hybrid lexical and dense methods, with tools to get exact source spans, answer from cited passages, and create and verify recheckable evidence packets.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables clients to query local cybersecurity evidence, retrieving source-backed passages, exact entities, documents, documented relationships, and database status from ATT&CK, OWASP, Sigma, CVE, KEV, and NVD data with citations and immutable snapshots.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables agents to search and reference trusted, out-of-band ingested source state, run claim-bound document reviews, validate evidence-status proposals against admissibility guards, and build evidence matrices. It keeps proposal, evidence, admissibility, and adjudication separate so agents can propose epistemic statuses without creating the source facts, page locators, provenance, or missingness records that support them.5MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to ask questions over the indexed document corpus and search handbook passages, returning cited answers and ranked results.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables evidence-based retrieval across official BMC Helix product documentation and isolated private project knowledge, with product, version, project, source, and section provenance. Supports version-aware multi-product indexing, hybrid lexical and optional semantic search, and read-only access to local evidence without touching live Helix systems.9MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
find_code is clearly distinct, but decide and evaluate_batch both perform batched paid OpenAI evaluations over text/files/images/PDFs. The distinction between multiple questions on shared evidence vs. common questions across many named items is useful but subtle enough that an agent could misselect.
All names use lowercase snake_case and start with an imperative verb, giving a mostly predictable pattern. decide is a bare verb while evaluate_batch and find_code include an object noun, which is a minor inconsistency.
Three tools is compact and each covers a meaningful operation, fitting the server's focused evaluation purpose. The slight overlap between decide and evaluate_batch keeps it from being a perfectly scoped set.
The surface covers single/batched evaluation across text, files, images, PDFs, and code relevance search, which is solid for an OpenAI decision/evaluation server. Minor gaps include reliance on external file listing for code discovery and no built-in project/file inventory.