Skip to main content
Glama
openai-decisions-mcp

openai-decisions-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to openai-decisions-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP agents to evaluate content against typed questions (yes/no, choice, or score) in a single parallel call.
      1
      39 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables local read-only search and retrieval of approved, current evidence via hybrid lexical and dense methods, with tools to get exact source spans, answer from cited passages, and create and verify recheckable evidence packets.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables clients to query local cybersecurity evidence, retrieving source-backed passages, exact entities, documents, documented relationships, and database status from ATT&CK, OWASP, Sigma, CVE, KEV, and NVD data with citations and immutable snapshots.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to search and reference trusted, out-of-band ingested source state, run claim-bound document reviews, validate evidence-status proposals against admissibility guards, and build evidence matrices. It keeps proposal, evidence, admissibility, and adjudication separate so agents can propose epistemic statuses without creating the source facts, page locators, provenance, or missingness records that support them.
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables evidence-based retrieval across official BMC Helix product documentation and isolated private project knowledge, with product, version, project, source, and section provenance. Supports version-aware multi-product indexing, hybrid lexical and optional semantic search, and read-only access to local evidence without touching live Helix systems.
      9
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    find_code is clearly distinct, but decide and evaluate_batch both perform batched paid OpenAI evaluations over text/files/images/PDFs. The distinction between multiple questions on shared evidence vs. common questions across many named items is useful but subtle enough that an agent could misselect.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use lowercase snake_case and start with an imperative verb, giving a mostly predictable pattern. decide is a bare verb while evaluate_batch and find_code include an object noun, which is a minor inconsistency.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is compact and each covers a meaningful operation, fitting the server's focused evaluation purpose. The slight overlap between decide and evaluate_batch keeps it from being a perfectly scoped set.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers single/batched evaluation across text, files, images, PDFs, and code relevance search, which is solid for an OpenAI decision/evaluation server. Minor gaps include reliance on external file listing for code discovery and no built-in project/file inventory.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessOutdated data