Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to ensmcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables local security scanning and compliance gap analysis for code and text, detecting secrets, PII, and OWASP vulnerabilities, and assessing readiness across major frameworks like NCA, ISO 27001, NIST CSF, and SOC 2.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides structured access to the full NIST cybersecurity catalog, including SP 800/1800 publications, security controls, CSF 2.0, and the NVD database. It enables AI assistants to search and retrieve cybersecurity standards, CVEs, and compliance guidance directly from a local SQLite index.
      20
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides instant access to authoritative security documentation from organizations like OWASP, NIST, and major cloud providers through natural language semantic search. It enables users to retrieve security best practices, frameworks, and vulnerability information directly from a locally cached knowledge base.
      4
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to look up, search, and browse NIST 800-53 and 800-171 security controls, including full control text, guidance, and related controls. Supports natural-language queries and control-family exploration for compliance and security research.
      2 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 19 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct resources, and the descriptions carefully delineate siblings like declaracion_aplicabilidad (applicability/DdA), alcance_auditoria (audit syllabus), evaluate_system_profile (profile scoring), and explain_applicability (per-measure reasoning). There is still residual overlap among these four applicability/audit-oriented tools since some share identical arguments, which could invite misselection.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The English tools follow a fairly consistent verb_noun pattern (get_measure, list_measures, create_dda, update_dda_measure_status), but five tools use Spanish noun phrases (declaracion_aplicabilidad, alcance_auditoria, evidencias_auditoria, requisitos_articulos, requisitos_auditoria), breaking the pattern. The set remains readable but mixes two conventions.

    Tool Count4/5

    At 19 tools the surface is somewhat heavy but each tool maps to a plausible ENS task (measure lookup, DdA lifecycle, audit requirements, crosswalks, data freshness). No obvious redundancy that inflates the count artificially, though a few audit/query tools sit close together.

    Completeness4/5

    DdA lifecycle is well covered (create, get, list, update status, export) plus measure retrieval, search, crosswalks, and multiple audit-requirement views. Minor gaps exist—no delete_dda and no measure-level editing—but agents can work around them.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues