Skip to main content
Glama
segentic-lab

codelens-mcp

by segentic-lab

Related Servers

Alternatives to codelens-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Standalone MCP server for code structure analysis using tree-sitter. Directory trees, symbol definitions, and call graphs without reading raw source files. Supports Rust, Python, Go, Java, TypeScript, Fortran, JavaScript, C/C++, and C#. Benchmarked up to 68% fewer tokens vs native tools.
      6
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides code context and analysis for AI assistants by extracting directory structures and code symbols using WebAssembly Tree-sitter parsers with zero native dependencies.
      1
      52 npm
      20
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that indexes your codebase using tree-sitter AST parsing and gives AI tools instant access to structural intelligence like dependency graphs, call trees, and dead code detection from a local SQLite database.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Structural code intelligence for AI agents. Scan once, query everything — dead exports, circular imports, dependency graphs, and more. CLI + MCP server.
      6 npm
      9
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Deterministic navigation maps over code AND markdown for AI agents: one MCP server, two lenses (tree-sitter TS/JS/Python + markdown). Map a whole project, read one function or one doc-section, ~99% less context. Merges codelens + docslens.
      13
      1
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that gives AI coding agents symbol definitions, dependency graphs, and a live architecture vocabulary for TypeScript/JavaScript repos, with no network or embeddings.
      16 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    overview and functions both list functions/classes, but overview provides a high-level structural map while functions exhaustively lists all addressable functions; the descriptions clearly differentiate them. map covers directory trees, find locates definitions by name, and function_body returns verbatim source, so each tool has a distinct role with minor potential confusion.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Most tool names are simple lowercase nouns (overview, functions, comments, map, info), but 'find' is a verb and 'function_body' uses an underscore, breaking a uniform pattern. The naming is still predictable and readable, though not consistently verb_noun or single-style.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools is well-scoped for a code navigation and analysis server. Each tool serves a distinct purpose, and none feel redundant or unnecessary.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers the core navigation lifecycle: directory maps, file overviews, function details, comment exploration, definition lookup, and focused source extraction. Missing are call sites or full-text search, but the stated purpose of locating code is well covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues