Skip to main content
Glama
segalz

xAI Grok MCP Bridge

by segalz
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to xAI Grok MCP Bridge

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • grok

      bigu1
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables OpenAI Codex to invoke the local Grok CLI as a second agent for code review, planning, design documents, PR babysitting, and media creation via MCP tools.
      Apache 2.0

    • grok-subagent

      Walvez
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Codex to use Grok Build CLI as a controlled subagent via MCP tools for independent investigation, review, and isolated implementation tasks.
      5
      MIT

    • Grok MCP

      jzubielik
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to run text chat, deep reasoning, vision analysis, and image generation through the xAI Grok API, alongside workspace file read/write/shell tools, web search, speech-to-text and text-to-speech, and background jobs with persistent conversation history in PostgreSQL. Supports both HTTP and stdio transports with per-tool model selection from the live xAI catalog.
      3
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose: general prompting, code review, session continuation, and version checking. No overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent pattern: 'grok_' prefix with snake_case verb or noun suffixes (ask, code_review, continue, version).

    Tool Count4/5

    4 tools is on the lower end but still appropriate for a focused bridge to a CLI tool. Could be expanded slightly but not under-scoped.

    Completeness4/5

    Core operations are covered: prompting, code review, session continuation, and version info. Missing session management or configuration tools but minimal for the domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources