A
licenseA
qualityA
maintenanceMCP server for free U.S. case-law and court-docket search via CourtListener, providing tools for opinion search, docket lookup, citation verification, and more.
10
8 npm
MIT
us-law-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to us-law-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides comprehensive US legislation.35 npm38MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for the Federal Register of Legislation, enabling point-in-time searches, retrieval, and verification of Australian Commonwealth law, including citation checking.863 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that turns the US Code of Federal Regulations into an agent-navigable citation graph, enabling traversal of regulatory references and detection of stale citations via structured tools.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceLegalMCP is a comprehensive US legal MCP server that enables AI assistants to search over 4 million US court opinions, manage Clio practice data, and access PACER federal filings through natural language.1868MIT
Vaquill-AI/vaquill-mcpofficial
AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Vaquill legal research API. Covers US federal + 50-state law (USC, CFR, state legislation, CourtListener case law)257MIT
TDQS
A4/5.0
Scored across 11 tools
Disambiguation3/5
The search and get tools (search_law/get_law_text, search_regulations/get_regulation_text, search_decisions/get_decision_text) are clearly distinct. However, legal_research, legal_analysis, and regulatory_radar have overlapping functionality, especially in citation verification and legal analysis, which could cause an agent to choose the wrong tool.
Naming Consistency3/5
Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (search_law, get_law_text, search_regulations, etc.). However, legal_research, regulatory_radar, and legal_analysis break this pattern, using noun phrases instead, creating a mixed convention that is still readable but not fully consistent.
Tool Count4/5
With 11 tools, the set is reasonably scoped for a legal research server, covering search, retrieval, and analysis across statutes, regulations, and case law. The inclusion of meta tools (discover_tools, execute_tool) adds a bit of complexity but does not make the count feel excessive.
Completeness4/5
The tool set covers the core lifecycle of legal research: search and retrieve statutory, regulatory, and case-law texts, plus specialized analysis for citation verification, overruling status, historical versions, and regulatory lag. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit tool for listing all statutes in a title, but search functionality mitigates this, and the hidden tools accessible via discover_tools/execute_tool extend the surface.
Maintenance
ActivityStale
ResponsivenessNo issues