Skip to main content
Glama
export-controls-agent

export-controls-agent

Related Servers

Alternatives to export-controls-agent

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Korean legal document processing, case analysis, and consultation using MCP, with OCR parsing, fact extraction, claim identification, subsumption grid, legal API verification, and document drafting.
      24
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Korean tax law for AI agents: search NTS rulings, court and Tax Tribunal decisions; read point-in-time statutes with the Act → Decree → Rule chain and amendment history; basic rules and execution standards; 96 tax treaties with withholding rates; forms and schedules; and verify citations in drafts. Fact-pattern comparison is done by your AI (or optional on-prem/cloud Upstage Solar).
      14
      48
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Korean tax, accounting, and finance professionals to pull statute text, delegated enforcement decrees and rules, NTS rulings, and annexes in a single lookup, and to check whether every statute or article citation in an AI draft actually exists (±verified, missing, or unverifiable), with statutory-formula calculations for items like executive severance limits and entertainment-expense caps.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables US import compliance by providing CBP customs ruling letter searches and antidumping/countervailing duty order lookups, answering how Customs has classified products and whether trade-remedy duties apply.
      288 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to query Korean statutes, delegated legislation, rulings, and administrative interpretations, verify citations, and calculate tax deadlines, penalties, and estimated liabilities.
      19
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools map to distinct workflow stages—jurisdiction, CCL text search, license requirements, exceptions, end-use, restricted-party screening, China controls, and drafting—so their purposes are largely separable. A few names could still be conflated: classify_eccn does not actually classify an item, and determine_license_requirement versus analyze_license_exceptions are both license-stage analyses, though their roles are ultimately distinct.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Almost all tools follow a snake_case verb_noun pattern such as draft_, build_, get_, check_, screen_, assess_, determine_, and analyze_. regime_overview breaks that pattern as a bare noun phrase, and classify_eccn uses an abbreviation rather than a full noun, but the naming is otherwise predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Thirteen tools is well suited to a compliance domain spanning U.S. EAR jurisdiction, Part 744 end-use rules, the Country Chart, license exceptions, restricted-party screening, Chinese export controls, Korean law retrieval, and compliance drafting. Each tool has a distinct purpose, and the count stays within the coherent range without redundant utilities.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers the main transaction workflow: EAR jurisdiction, CCL text search, license requirement determination, license exception analysis, end-use checks, restricted-party screening, China controls, and Korean law access. Minor gaps remain around true ECCN classification, direct retrieval of full CCL entries, and Korean or Chinese restricted-party screening, but agents can work around these using the provided search and regime-coverage tools.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues