Skip to main content
Glama
seelpeed-debug

export-controls-agent

by seelpeed-debug
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to export-controls-agent

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Gyeongguk

      kmjy98-sketch
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Korean legal document processing, case analysis, and consultation using MCP, with OCR parsing, fact extraction, claim identification, subsumption grid, legal API verification, and document drafting.
      24
      MIT

    • korean-privacy-law-mcp

      scvcoder
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables natural language interaction with the Korean Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA) through 37 MCP tools that search, compare, analyze, and verify legal texts, official guidelines, and consulting cases from authoritative sources.
      37
      11 npm
      4
      MIT

    • korean-law-mcp

      yunsy84
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables legal research and analysis of Korean law through 42 National Law Information Center APIs exposed as 10 tools, including statute/precedent search, citation hallucination verification, precedent citator checks, law version comparisons, applicable law determination, and ordinance maintenance review.
      10
      4,664 npm
      MIT

    • 갈피 법령조회 MCP

      uscaidev
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search and retrieve Korean laws, regulations, administrative rules, legal interpretations, and precedents via official APIs for legal review workflows.
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools map to distinct workflow stages—jurisdiction, CCL text search, license requirements, exceptions, end-use, restricted-party screening, China controls, and drafting—so their purposes are largely separable. A few names could still be conflated: classify_eccn does not actually classify an item, and determine_license_requirement versus analyze_license_exceptions are both license-stage analyses, though their roles are ultimately distinct.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Almost all tools follow a snake_case verb_noun pattern such as draft_, build_, get_, check_, screen_, assess_, determine_, and analyze_. regime_overview breaks that pattern as a bare noun phrase, and classify_eccn uses an abbreviation rather than a full noun, but the naming is otherwise predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Thirteen tools is well suited to a compliance domain spanning U.S. EAR jurisdiction, Part 744 end-use rules, the Country Chart, license exceptions, restricted-party screening, Chinese export controls, Korean law retrieval, and compliance drafting. Each tool has a distinct purpose, and the count stays within the coherent range without redundant utilities.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers the main transaction workflow: EAR jurisdiction, CCL text search, license requirement determination, license exception analysis, end-use checks, restricted-party screening, China controls, and Korean law access. Minor gaps remain around true ECCN classification, direct retrieval of full CCL entries, and Korean or Chinese restricted-party screening, but agents can work around these using the provided search and regime-coverage tools.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources