Skip to main content
Glama
seelpeed-debug

export-controls-agent

Related Servers

Alternatives to export-controls-agent

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Korean legal document processing, case analysis, and consultation using MCP, with OCR parsing, fact extraction, claim identification, subsumption grid, legal API verification, and document drafting.
      24
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Korean tax law for AI agents: search NTS rulings, court and Tax Tribunal decisions; read point-in-time statutes with the Act → Decree → Rule chain and amendment history; basic rules and execution standards; 96 tax treaties with withholding rates; forms and schedules; and verify citations in drafts. Fact-pattern comparison is done by your AI (or optional on-prem/cloud Upstage Solar).
      23
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Korean tax, accounting, and finance professionals to pull statute text, delegated enforcement decrees and rules, NTS rulings, and annexes in a single lookup, and to check whether every statute or article citation in an AI draft actually exists (±verified, missing, or unverifiable), with statutory-formula calculations for items like executive severance limits and entertainment-expense caps.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables US import compliance by providing CBP customs ruling letter searches and antidumping/countervailing duty order lookups, answering how Customs has classified products and whether trade-remedy duties apply.
      6 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables natural language interaction with the Korean Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA) through 37 MCP tools that search, compare, analyze, and verify legal texts, official guidelines, and consulting cases from authoritative sources.
      37
      19 npm
      4
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools map to distinct workflow stages—jurisdiction, CCL text search, license requirements, exceptions, end-use, restricted-party screening, China controls, and drafting—so their purposes are largely separable. A few names could still be conflated: classify_eccn does not actually classify an item, and determine_license_requirement versus analyze_license_exceptions are both license-stage analyses, though their roles are ultimately distinct.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Almost all tools follow a snake_case verb_noun pattern such as draft_, build_, get_, check_, screen_, assess_, determine_, and analyze_. regime_overview breaks that pattern as a bare noun phrase, and classify_eccn uses an abbreviation rather than a full noun, but the naming is otherwise predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Thirteen tools is well suited to a compliance domain spanning U.S. EAR jurisdiction, Part 744 end-use rules, the Country Chart, license exceptions, restricted-party screening, Chinese export controls, Korean law retrieval, and compliance drafting. Each tool has a distinct purpose, and the count stays within the coherent range without redundant utilities.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers the main transaction workflow: EAR jurisdiction, CCL text search, license requirement determination, license exception analysis, end-use checks, restricted-party screening, China controls, and Korean law access. Minor gaps remain around true ECCN classification, direct retrieval of full CCL entries, and Korean or Chinese restricted-party screening, but agents can work around these using the provided search and regime-coverage tools.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues