kitty_set_enabled_layouts

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description bears full burden. Discloses key behavior: if current layout is not in the enabled list, it switches to the first enabled layout. Does not mention permissions or side effects, but sufficient for a settings tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences: purpose stated first, then behavioral detail, then usage hint. No redundant words or filler. Efficient and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Explains purpose and fallback behavior. Does not clarify behavior when match is omitted (likely current tab) or persistence across sessions. However, given no output schema and low complexity, it is fairly complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema covers all 3 parameters (100% coverage). Description adds minimal extra value: mentions using '*' as alternative to 'all' for layouts. Baseline 3 is appropriate as schema already provides meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Describes specific verb 'Set', resource 'layouts available for cycling', and scope 'in the specified tab'. Distinguishes from siblings like kitty_goto_layout (which sets current layout) and kitty_last_used_layout.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies usage for configuring cycling layouts, describes behavior when current layout not in list. No explicit exclusions or alternatives mentioned, but context signals sibling differentiation is sufficient.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.