structured-address-fix-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to structured-address-fix-mcp
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMatches expected payments (pain.001) against observed booked entries (camt.053) for ISO 20022 cash reconciliation, providing explainable match results with scoring and classification.1049 PyPI1Apache 2.0
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for AddressPenny address validation that enables users to validate postal addresses, bulk-clean address lists, and extract addresses from unstructured text through Claude Desktop, Cursor, and other MCP-compatible agents.316 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides AI agents with tools to validate SWIFT MT and ISO 20022 MX payment messages, check BIC/IBAN correctness, and convert between MT and MX formats.76 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server that enables AI agents to parse, validate, and reverse ISO 20022 bank statements, with tools for discovering message types and return reasons.24322 PyPI2Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceA fully local, closed-world MCP server that manages, validates, and serves bank-specific ISO 20022 clearing profiles and rule packs, enabling AI agents to discover profiles, fetch them, lint payloads against them, and validate rule-pack definitions.449 PyPI1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA local-first MCP server for financial wire message forensics, providing read-only tools to parse, validate, and detect SR2026 address compliance in ISO 8583, SWIFT MT, and ISO 20022 messages.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to explain, scrub and check ISO 20022 payment messages and SSI files entirely on the local machine, including CBPR+ readiness hints, lifecycle triage, IBAN/BIC validation and payment-vs-SSI checks against the user's own licensed reference data. Runs as a local stdio MCP server with no network calls, telemetry or bundled vendor data.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 13 tools
Most tools are clearly separated by scope (single address vs message, assess vs remediate), but preview_patch substantially overlaps remediate_message with apply=false, and the parsing helpers have fuzzy boundaries. Descriptions and cross-references help, but an agent could still select the wrong tool in several cases.
All tool names follow the same verb_noun snake_case convention: list_, assess_, remediate_, preview_, explain_, get_, normalize_, split_, validate_, parse_. The pattern is predictable and makes the action and target easy to infer.
Thirteen tools is within the ideal range for a domain covering policy discovery, assessment, remediation, patch preview, explanation, and address parsing helpers. The count feels appropriate for the breadth of the structured-address-fix workflow, not padded or excessive.
The tool surface covers the core workflow well: list policies, assess messages and addresses, preview and apply remediation, explain findings, and normalize/parse address components. Minor gaps exist, such as no way to enumerate all finding codes and parse_address_libpostal not mapping every ISO 20022 sub-field, but agents can work around these.