Skip to main content
Glama

Generate pain XML (async, large batches)

generate_message_async
Read-onlyIdempotent

Generate validated pain XML messages off the event loop for large payment batches. Ideal for high-volume records where blocking would be an issue.

Instructions

Generate validated pain XML off the event loop, for large batches.

Behaves exactly like ``generate_message`` but runs the synchronous
renderer in a worker thread so an agent can interleave a long
generation with other tool calls. Use ``generate_message`` for small
or interactive batches; use this only when the record count is large
enough that blocking would matter.

Delegates to :func:`pain001.async_adapter.generate_xml_string_async`.
Returns the validated XML, or a JSON-encoded ``{"error": ...}`` payload.

Args:
    message_type: A supported ISO 20022 pain message type.
    records: One or more flat payment records.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
recordsYesSame record shape and ergonomics as generate_message; use this async variant only when the batch is large. One or more flat payment records (dicts of field name → value). Key fields (see get_input_schema for the full contract): id, date (payment-initiation timestamp; 'YYYY-MM-DD' is accepted and rendered as midnight), initiator_name, payment_id, requested_execution_date ('YYYY-MM-DD'), debtor_name, debtor_account_IBAN, debtor_agent_BIC, creditor_name, creditor_account_IBAN, creditor_agent_BIC, payment_amount (alias: 'amount'; max two decimals), currency (alias: 'payment_currency'; ISO 4217, e.g. 'EUR'), remittance_information. batch_booking accepts JSON true/false. nb_of_txs and ctrl_sum are computed automatically from the records and may be omitted. payment_method defaults to 'TRF' and charge_bearer to 'SLEV'. IBAN and BIC values are strictly validated and never coerced.
message_typeYesA supported ISO 20022 pain message type. Must be exactly one of: 'pain.001.001.03', 'pain.001.001.04', 'pain.001.001.05', 'pain.001.001.06', 'pain.001.001.07', 'pain.001.001.08', 'pain.001.001.09', 'pain.001.001.10', 'pain.001.001.11', 'pain.001.001.12', 'pain.001.001.13', 'pain.008.001.02', 'pain.001', 'pain.008' (see list_message_types). The bare family names 'pain.001' and 'pain.008' are accepted as aliases for 'pain.001.001.09' and 'pain.008.001.02'.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds context beyond annotations: it runs in a worker thread, delegates to a specific async adapter, returns validated XML or error JSON. Annotations already indicate read-only and idempotent, but the description clarifies the async behavior and error handling.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Well-structured and front-loaded with purpose and usage guidance. The Args section somewhat duplicates schema descriptions but adds valuable detail. Could be slightly shorter, but overall efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers all essential aspects: purpose, behavior comparison, delegation, return format, and thorough parameter details. Given the complexity (async, large batches, many parameters) with output schema present, the description is complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, yet the description adds extensive detail: record shape, aliases, defaults, validation rules for IBAN/BIC, and enum aliases for message_type. This goes well beyond the schema's descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Generate validated pain XML off the event loop, for large batches.' It specifies the resource (pain XML), action (generate), and distinguishes from the synchronous sibling generate_message by noting the async execution for large batches.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicit guidance: 'Use generate_message for small or interactive batches; use this only when the record count is large enough that blocking would matter.' This tells when to use this tool vs. the alternative.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/sebastienrousseau/pain001-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server