Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to noyalib-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      LLM-native code tools: 44 MCP tools for AI agents to read, understand and modify code. Rust tree-sitter parse daemon (crash-isolated), SQLite symbol index (repo map 98ms), transactional journal-backed writes, deterministic quality gates (zero LLM calls). 512MB cgroup: 128 concurrent, zero OOM. MIT.
      3
      44
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A server for the Machine Chat Protocol (MCP) that provides a YAML-based configuration system for LLM applications, allowing users to define resources, tools, and prompts without writing code.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server wrapping local Ollama models for offload from API-priced orchestrators. Nine stdio tools - generation, summarisation, analysis, drafting, code tasks (docstring/test/explain/review/types/refactor-suggest), diff-driven tasks (commit-message/pr-description/changelog/summary/impact), mechanical transforms, and model management (list/pull). Apache-2.0.
      16 npm
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have completely distinct and complementary roles: one for reading values (noyalib_get) and one for writing values (noyalib_set). There is no overlap in functionality, and the descriptions explicitly guide when to use each.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent 'noyalib_verb' pattern with clear action verbs 'get' and 'set'. The naming is predictable and matches conventional CRUD terminology.

    Tool Count4/5

    With only two tools, the set is minimal but appropriate for the focused purpose of reading and writing YAML paths losslessly. It covers the core operations without unnecessary bloat, though additional operations like deletion could be warranted.

    Completeness4/5

    The tools cover the essential read and write operations for YAML path manipulation. However, there is no tool for deleting or listing paths, which might be needed in some workflows. The set is complete for its stated use case (version bumps and config patches) but not fully generic.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues