iso20022-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to iso20022-mcp
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that exposes the pain001 ISO 20022 Customer Credit Transfer Initiation library as agent tools, enabling AI assistants to generate and validate standardized payment XML messages.26353 PyPI1Apache 2.0
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to get grounded answers about ISO 20022 financial messaging from the ISO 20022 Navigator reference data. It lets users look up what a bank transaction code means, what an ISO 20022 message is and how large its structure is, which ISO 20022 message replaces a legacy message (e.g. MT103 to pacs.008), which payment schemes use a message, and what an external code set contains.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for ISO 20022 acmt.001 Account Opening (and companion acmt.* messages): message-type discovery, required-field lookup, JSON Schema introspection, IBAN/BIC/LEI validation, flat-record validation, and validated acmt XML generation.7436 PyPI1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA local-first MCP server for financial wire message forensics, providing read-only tools to parse, validate, and detect SR2026 address compliance in ISO 8583, SWIFT MT, and ISO 20022 messages.Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables ISO 20022 stablecoin compliance with tools for DTI lookup, pacs.008 generation, SWIFT deadline monitoring, MiCA cross-checks, Travel Rule checks, and structured address validation. It helps verify settlement references, address formats, and authorization status before sending ISO 20022 messages.-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server that enables AI agents to parse, validate, and reverse ISO 20022 bank statements, with tools for discovering message types and return reasons.24416 PyPI2Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenancePactus is an MCP server for parsing and validating ISO 20022 payment messages directly from chat. It exposes nine tools that let AI assistants inspect or validate pacs.008, pacs.002, pain.001, and camt.053 messages — the message types at the centre of the CBPR+ migration — without leaving the conversation.92MIT
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
The two discovery/listing tools (list_servers vs list_families) and the two catalogue tools (search vs describe) have some conceptual overlap, but descriptions clearly delineate them (catalogue-wide routing vs per-family readiness vs discovery vs schema inspection). The action tools validate/generate/parse are cleanly separated by direction and intent.
All names are lowercase consistent verbs, and the two multi-word names (list_servers, list_families) follow a clean verb_noun pattern. Minor deviation between bare verbs (search, describe, validate, generate, parse) and the list_* pair, but still highly predictable.
Seven tools is well-scoped for a gateway/orchestration layer whose job is discovery, schema inspection, and dispatching parse/generate/validate. Each tool earns its place with no filler.
The surface covers the full discovery-to-execution lifecycle (search, describe, list_*, validate, generate, parse). The generate/parse asymmetry across families is intentional and documented, though the absence of any pain/acmt parsing path leaves a slight round-trip gap that agents must work around.