Skip to main content
Glama
sebastienrousseau

iso20022-evidence-pack-mcp

Verify an evidence-pack seal

verify_seal
Read-onlyIdempotent

Verify the integrity of an evidence pack by recomputing its seal and comparing it to an expected digest.

Instructions

Recompute a pack's seal and compare it to an expected digest.

Args:
    pack_content: The evidence pack to check, as JSON text.
    expected_digest: The seal the pack is expected to carry.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pack_contentYesAn evidence pack as raw JSON text.
expected_digestYesThe seal to check the pack against.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint and idempotentHint. The description adds that it compares to an expected digest but does not disclose additional traits beyond what annotations provide.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with minimal waste. Two sentences explain the main action and parameters.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema and clear annotations, the description adequately covers the verification functionality. It could mention return result but output schema fills that gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and the description's parameter explanations mirror the schema descriptions. No additional meaning is added beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses specific verbs ('Recompute', 'compare') and clearly identifies the resource ('pack's seal'). It distinguishes from sibling tools like seal_pack (creates seal) and verify_pack_signature (verifies signature).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description states the basic operation but does not explicitly guide when to use this tool versus siblings. Usage is implied but not explicitly stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/sebastienrousseau/iso20022-evidence-pack-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server