Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to agentmux

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables any MCP client to launch and manage subagent sessions in installed coding agents like Codex, Claude Code, Grok, and OpenCode, using your existing logins and chosen models.
      10 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables orchestrating multiple AI CLI agents (Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Copilot CLI) through a unified MCP interface for task delegation, cross-agent comparison, and specialized tools like code review and debugging.
      14
      3 npm
      14
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables any MCP-compatible client to use existing Claude Code agents from .claude/agents/ directories. Spawns agents in separate CLI sessions for better context optimization and performance across Codex, Gemini CLI, and other AI coding assistants.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables multiple coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor) to discover each other's sessions, search transcripts, ask questions, and handoff tasks through a shared MCP server.
      5
      2 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 17 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct resources and actions: sessions, jobs, teams, messages, and provider metadata are clearly separated. The main ambiguity is between send and message_send, but their descriptions clarify session continuation versus persisted messaging.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Naming is readable but mixes conventions: verb_noun (team_create, team_status), noun_verb (message_send, message_ack), bare verbs (send, wait, list, kill), and nouns (inbox, status, providers). The send/message_send pair is especially inconsistent.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 17 tools, the server is at the borderline of feeling heavy for an orchestration/mux utility. Each tool covers a distinct concern, but the count is above the typical well-scoped range.

    Completeness3/5

    The surface covers core session, job, team, and messaging workflows, but there are notable gaps: no way to list all jobs, no team deletion or update, and no session transcript/history retrieval. These gaps can force workarounds but basic orchestration is functional.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues