Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to SeaTable MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides database operations as tools for LLM-powered applications. Supports PostgreSQL, MySQL, and MongoDB databases with connection pooling and flexible result formatting.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Production-ready MCP server designed to empower AI agents and LLMs to interact seamlessly with ClickHouse. It exposes your ClickHouse database as a set of standardized tools and resources that adhere to the MCP protocol, making it easy for agents built on OpenAI, Claude, or other platforms to query, explore, and analyse your data.
      38
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables AI agents to interact with Microsoft SQL Server databases through secure, intelligent database operations. This server provides comprehensive CRUD capabilities, schema introspection, stored procedure execution, transaction management, and bulk opera
      571 npm
      41
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that provides read and write access to Airtable databases. This server enables LLMs to inspect database schemas, then read and write records.
      2,950 npm
      458
      TypeScript
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 21 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes (e.g., add_row vs. append_rows, find_rows vs. list_rows vs. search_rows). However, add_row and append_rows could cause confusion, though descriptions clearly advise using append_rows for multiple rows. Similarly, list_rows, find_rows, search_rows, and query_sql overlap in querying but differ in method, with clear guidance on when to use each.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., add_row, delete_rows, list_rows, update_rows, upload_file). Minor deviations: ping_seatable (ping is not a data operation) and query_sql (verb before the type). Overall, most tools are predictable and follow the same style.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 21 tools, the count is slightly high but reasonable given the breadth of operations (CRUD, linking, file handling, SQL queries, snapshots). Each tool serves a specific need, and the number aligns well with a comprehensive database-like API. No obvious bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers most essential operations: CRUD for rows (add, get, update, delete, upsert), linking, file upload/download, search, schema inspection, and snapshots. Minor gaps: no tool to modify table schema directly (only add_select_options), and no bulk delete or export functionality. Overall, very thorough for a typical use case.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues