Skip to main content
Glama
seandkendall

productivity-mcp

by seandkendall

Related Servers

Alternatives to productivity-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local MCP server for reading/sending email via Gmail and managing Google Calendar events, enabling an AI agent to handle email and calendar operations through natural language.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that unifies email and calendar management across multiple providers, enabling AI agents to search, read, and write with explicit approval and local-first security.
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provider-agnostic email MCP server that connects any IMAP mailbox to AI assistants, enabling email management through natural language.
      8
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that gives an AI assistant access to IMAP/SMTP mailboxes to read, search, organize, draft, and send email, with local mirroring and full-text search, no third-party data path, and credentials stored only in the macOS Keychain.
      6 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A private, single-user MCP server that unifies Gmail, Microsoft 365/Outlook, and IMAP mailboxes for LLMs to search and read emails live, without storing or caching mailbox contents.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A self-hosted, multi-mailbox MCP server that exposes IMAP/SMTP operations as tools for AI agents, enabling email management like listing folders, reading, searching, sending, and moving messages via natural language.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 39 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose. Single vs bulk operations are explicitly separated, email, calendar, task, and contact tools are grouped by domain, and search utilities have specific scopes (by sender, threads, events). No two tools appear to overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with lowercase underscores (e.g., 'create_event', 'list_emails', 'delete_event'). No mixing of camelCase or other conventions, making it easy for an agent to predict tool names.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 39 tools covering email, calendar, tasks, and contacts, the count is on the higher side but still reasonable for a comprehensive productivity suite. Each tool serves a distinct purpose, and the breadth is justified by the domain's complexity.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface is largely complete, covering CRUD for email (including bulk operations and drafts) and calendar (including free/busy and suggestion), plus tasks and contacts. Minor gaps like missing update/delete for tasks are not critical for most use cases.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues