Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to datev-extf-mcp

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A local MCP server for analyzing DATEV bookkeeping data in natural language. It reads EXTF export files locally and provides tools for balances, open items, and booking search.
    4
    MIT

Related Servers

  • F
    license
    B
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    MCP server for DACH accounting automation. Connect AI assistants to sevDesk and Lexoffice — create invoices, manage contacts, handle bookings and vouchers for German-speaking businesses.
    15
    28 npm
    -
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    MCP server for German e-invoice compliance (XRechnung 3.0 & ZUGFeRD 2.x) enabling AI agents to validate, generate, parse, and check compliance of electronic invoices per EN 16931.
    6
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    MCP server for DACH e-invoicing. Create XRechnung (UBL) and ZUGFeRD 2.3 (Factur-X CII) invoices, validate against EN 16931 rules, extract data from XML, and convert between UBL, CII and JSON formats.
    6
    30 npm
    2
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    An MCP server that enables AI assistants to parse, validate, and analyze Portuguese SAF-T tax files, providing tools for querying invoices, customers, products, VAT breakdowns, and anomaly detection.
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Hosted MCP server for Exact Online. Ask questions, pull reports, and prepare bookings you approve first.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    MCP server for the ezBookkeeping HTTP API, enabling read and write access to transactions, accounts, categories, tags, templates, analytics, and exchange rates via natural language.
    23
    MIT

TDQS

A4.4/5.0

Scored across 4 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a single, distinct responsibility: listing columns, validating files, explaining validation findings, and writing a Buchungsstapel. The only close pair is validate/explain, but one performs checks while the other only resolves finding codes, so there is no real ambiguity.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: list_datev_columns, validate_datev_extf, explain_datev_finding, write_buchungsstapel. The verbs are clear, consistently placed first, and there is no mixing of naming conventions.

Tool Count5/5

Four tools is well-scoped for this focused DATEV EXTF helper server. Each tool covers a distinct part of the workflow and none feels redundant or unnecessary.

Completeness4/5

The Buchungsstapel lifecycle is well covered: list columns, validate, explain errors, and write a pre-validated file. However, list_datev_columns and validate_datev_extf also cover Debitoren/Kreditoren files, but there is no corresponding writer for that format, leaving a noticeable gap.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues