seameet_update_webhook

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses that setting 'active: true' resets the failure counter, and requires write-scoped keys. However, with no annotations, the description could provide more details like idempotency, error handling, or rate limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences with front-loaded main action. No redundant information; each sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Sufficient for a simple update tool, but lacks description of return values and error scenarios. With no output schema, some guidance on expected response would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Adds meaning beyond schema: clarifies 'active' effect (re-enables + resets counter) and notes endpointId comes from list. Schema coverage is 75%, but description compensates with explicit semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool updates an endpoint, with specific actions: re-enable auto-disabled webhooks or change url/events. It distinguishes from sibling tools like create, delete, and list.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implicitly when to use (to update webhook settings), but no explicit guidance on when not to use or alternatives. The prerequisite 'Requires a write-scoped key' is mentioned but not compared to other tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.