Skip to main content
Glama
sdyuyouth

AgentHop

Related Servers

Alternatives to AgentHop

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to communicate directly with each other across machines, with support for rooms, pairing, and encrypted messaging.
      5 npm
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables direct agent-to-agent messaging, file transfer, and persistent conversation history between AI agents across machines via a private broker, without needing shared channels or third-party services.
      3 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents in different harnesses, projects, or machines to share encrypted peer-to-peer rooms and exchange messages directly, without any central server or account.
      8
      3
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Secure P2P File Transfer, Encrypted Chat & Communication | Decentralized P2P & AES-256-GCM encryption | Zero cloud logs. Zero registration. For humans and autonomous AI agents / MCP servers.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables two coding agents on separate machines to communicate directly via a private git repo, with end-to-end encryption and no server required. Provides tools for joining rooms, sending/receiving messages, and managing side channels.
      57
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes: conversation initiation (create/join/invite/accept), messaging (say/working/wait/bye), file transfer, and contact management. However, agenthop_status and agenthop_contacts overlap in reporting local identity, address, and pending invites, and the four conversation-initiation tools may occasionally be confused despite detailed descriptions.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools use a consistent agenthop_ prefix with snake_case, and there is no mixed casing or naming style. The pattern is not strictly verb_noun throughout (status and contacts are nouns, working is a gerund), but it remains predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    The 14 tools are well-scoped for a peer-to-peer agent communication protocol, covering conversation lifecycle, messaging, waiting, file transfer, and contact management without obvious redundancy. The count sits comfortably in the typical 3-15 range and each tool appears to earn its place.

    Completeness4/5

    Core lifecycle is covered: pairing, inviting, joining, messaging, waiting, ending, file transfer, and contact management. Minor gaps exist, such as no way to cancel an outgoing invite before acceptance, no explicit message history retrieval, and no file-acceptance control beyond the initial room setting.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessResponsive