cisco-secure-access-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to cisco-secure-access-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager (vManage) that exposes REST API as tools for AI assistants to query and manage SD-WAN fabric, including device management, monitoring, templates, and policies.9-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA local MCP server that exposes Cisco IQ's Assets and Assessments REST APIs as read-only MCP tools, enabling AI assistants to query asset inventory, contracts, lifecycle data, security advisories, and field notices.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to query and manage Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center devices, policies, and deployments over streamable HTTP, and is designed to demonstrate Cisco AI Defense's in-path control of MCP tool calls.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA governed MCP server that enforces OAuth 2.1 scope checking and policy-driven access control for AI agents, providing a full audit trail on every tool call. It includes tools for Cisco Webex Contact Center knowledge search and SD-WAN network operations.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProduction-grade MCP server that exposes the complete HPE Aruba Networking Central REST API as 90 tools across 19 categories, enabling AI assistants to manage Aruba Central networks.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that exposes a 60+ tool security and threat-intel stack to AI agents, enabling secret scanning, Sigma rule generation, ransomware lookup, OSINT, and deep research.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 42 tools
Tools are cleanly separated by prefixes (admin_, deploy_, policy_) and within each group verbs like list, get, create, delete, update clearly distinguish their purposes. No two tools overlap in functionality.
All tools follow a consistent domain_verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., admin_list_api_keys, deploy_delete_site). No mixing of conventions or ambiguous verb choices.
42 tools is on the higher side but justified given the three distinct domains (admin, deploy, policy) and the breadth of Cisco Secure Access. Each domain has a reasonable number of tools for its scope, though some could be consolidated.
The tool set covers CRUD for most resources but notably lacks update operations for deploy resources (networks, tunnel groups, sites, roaming computers) and for policy destination/application lists. This forces agents to delete and recreate to modify, which is a significant gap.