Skip to main content
Glama
scoutos-labs

Scout MCP Server

Official
by scoutos-labs
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Scout MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Foundry Agents MCP Server

      denniszielke
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Exposes Azure AI Foundry agents, workflows, and AI Search vector-database capabilities as MCP tools, enabling natural language interaction with agents, semantic search, and index management.
      10
      2
      MIT

    • Nibble

      Talia04
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to investigate production incidents by exposing service health, logs, and deployment data through MCP tools.
      5 npm
      -

    • mendix-mcp-server

      dhanavel-013
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to read and modify Mendix application models through MCP tools for creating modules, entities, pages, microflows, deploying, and querying runtime data.
      1
      -

    • Relay

      adarshp14
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to access a unified catalog of tools from various APIs (OpenAPI, GraphQL, MCP, Google Discovery) through the MCP protocol.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action: listing apps, creating apps, deploying, fetching logs, and getting/setting port configuration. There is no overlap or ambiguity between these operations.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Naming is mixed: some tools follow noun_verb (app_list, app_create, port_get, port_set), while others are bare verbs or nouns (deploy, logs). This is readable but lacks a consistent pattern.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 6 tools, the server is well-scoped for app and deployment management. Each tool covers a core function and the count is appropriate for the stated purpose.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers app creation, listing, deployment, log retrieval, and port config. Minor gaps include no explicit app deletion, app details retrieval, or deployment status checks, but core workflows are reasonably covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessSyncing

    Resources