Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to llama-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Exposes local Ollama as an MCP server so Claude can delegate drafting, summarization, translation, code review, error explanation, model listing, health checks, and file reading to local models via stdio or HTTP.
      221 npm
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Bridges LM Studio local models to Claude Code as MCP tools, enabling private and free AI-assisted subtasks. Includes respond and models tools with automatic model selection and structured output.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to scan local GGUF models, estimate VRAM and suggest GPU offload layers, manage llama-server lifecycle, and proxy OpenAI-format chats with idle auto-unload.
      9
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that connects LLM agents to a local LM Studio instance, enabling model management, OpenAI-compatible chat completions, text completions, and embeddings through a set of tools.
      9
      1
      -

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    chat and complete both send text to the model and return output, so their boundary rests entirely on the chat-template distinction, which the descriptions do clarify. tokenize, models, and health are each clearly distinct from that pair and from each other.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names are single lowercase words in a consistent casing style, which keeps them readable. However, the set mixes bare verbs (chat, complete, tokenize) with bare nouns (models, health) with no predictable verb_noun pattern.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for a thin wrapper over a local llama-server: two generation modes, tokenizer access, model listing, and a health probe. Each tool earns its place with no obvious redundancy.

    Completeness3/5

    Core inference and diagnostics are covered, but common llama-server capabilities are absent: embeddings, explicit model selection/load-unload for router mode, and detokenization. Agents can still work around these gaps but will hit dead ends for embedding workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues