get_alarms

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description must carry behavioral disclosure. It specifies that only active alarms are listed and gives examples of alarm types, which adds context beyond the name. However, it doesn't disclose output structure, ordering, permissions, or limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence that front-loads the verb and resource, then notes filtering options. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is a straightforward read operation with all input parameters documented in the schema. The description doesn't explain the return format, but the examples of alarm types partly compensate for the absent output schema. It lacks details on pagination or error handling, but overall is adequate for a simple list tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

All four parameters have thorough schema descriptions, achieving 100% coverage. The description's mention of filtering by severity, type, and device mirrors the schema without adding new syntax or default behavior information.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'List' and identifies the resource as 'active security alarms from Firewalla', with examples that distinguish it from sibling tools like get_devices or get_top_talkers. It clearly states the tool's scope and filtering capabilities.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit mention of when to use this tool over alternatives or exclusions. The description implies usage for retrieving security alarms, but doesn't reference sibling tools or provide decision guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.