Skip to main content
Glama
scitex-ai

crossref-local

by scitex-ai

Related Servers

Alternatives to crossref-local

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local MCP server for searching scientific papers, retrieving metadata and abstracts, and legally downloading Open Access PDFs via OpenAlex, CrossRef, and Unpaywall APIs.
      5
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for downloading academic papers from DOI or title, resolving references, and generating citations. Supports batch downloads, multiple mirrors, and optional Unpaywall integration.
      11
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server for academic literature research that integrates Scopus, CrossRef, OpenAlex, and Unpaywall to search documents, get abstracts, author profiles, citing papers, and open-access PDF links.
      9
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP server that analyzes research papers, maps citation graphs, and surfaces insights with verbatim-verified contradictions, all while keeping data private on your machine.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Comprehensive MCP server for academic research workflows, enabling paper searching across multiple sources, manuscript processing with citation placeholders, search caching, and citation export.
      11
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 17 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes (search, DOI lookup, cache management, visualization, status). However, cache_stats and cache_citation_summary overlap in providing citation statistics, and search_by_doi and enrich_dois both fetch metadata by DOI, which could confuse an agent.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The naming generally follows a verb_noun pattern with clear prefixes like cache_, search_, check_, and enrich_. Minor inconsistencies exist, such as get_status vs. cache_* verbs and the crossref_local_skills_* prefix, but overall the pattern is predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    17 tools is on the heavier side but appropriate for the scope: searching, enriching, caching, citation checking, visualization, and skill navigation. Each tool has a specific role, and the count is not excessive given the domain.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers core workflows: search, metadata enrichment, DOI validation, BibTeX checking, cache creation/querying/export/visualization, and status. Minor gaps exist, such as no cache deletion or cache update tool, but these are not critical for the primary use case.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues