crossref-local
Related Servers
Alternatives to crossref-local
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceA local MCP server for searching scientific papers, retrieving metadata and abstracts, and legally downloading Open Access PDFs via OpenAlex, CrossRef, and Unpaywall APIs.53MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for downloading academic papers from DOI or title, resolving references, and generating citations. Supports batch downloads, multiple mirrors, and optional Unpaywall integration.112MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server for academic literature research that integrates Scopus, CrossRef, OpenAlex, and Unpaywall to search documents, get abstracts, author profiles, citing papers, and open-access PDF links.9MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server enabling AI agents to search and retrieve scientific papers, citations, and author profiles from Crossref, OpenAlex, and Semantic Scholar with no API keys required.518 PyPI3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA local-first MCP server that analyzes research papers, maps citation graphs, and surfaces insights with verbatim-verified contradictions, all while keeping data private on your machine.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceComprehensive MCP server for academic research workflows, enabling paper searching across multiple sources, manuscript processing with citation placeholders, search caching, and citation export.11MIT
TDQS
Scored across 17 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes (search, DOI lookup, cache management, visualization, status). However, cache_stats and cache_citation_summary overlap in providing citation statistics, and search_by_doi and enrich_dois both fetch metadata by DOI, which could confuse an agent.
The naming generally follows a verb_noun pattern with clear prefixes like cache_, search_, check_, and enrich_. Minor inconsistencies exist, such as get_status vs. cache_* verbs and the crossref_local_skills_* prefix, but overall the pattern is predictable.
17 tools is on the heavier side but appropriate for the scope: searching, enriching, caching, citation checking, visualization, and skill navigation. Each tool has a specific role, and the count is not excessive given the domain.
The tool surface covers core workflows: search, metadata enrichment, DOI validation, BibTeX checking, cache creation/querying/export/visualization, and status. Minor gaps exist, such as no cache deletion or cache update tool, but these are not critical for the primary use case.