ligolo_proxy_stop
Stops the running Ligolo-ng proxy server on Kali, halting all active network tunnels and routes.
Instructions
Stop the running ligolo-ng proxy server on Kali
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Stops the running Ligolo-ng proxy server on Kali, halting all active network tunnels and routes.
Stop the running ligolo-ng proxy server on Kali
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Description implies a destructive action (stopping a server) but does not elaborate on side effects, such as termination of active tunnels or connections.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, perfectly concise with no unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple stop action with no parameters and no output schema, the description is complete and sufficient.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so the description naturally adds no parameter info; baseline 4 applies for zero-parameter tools.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states verb 'Stop' and resource 'ligolo-ng proxy server', distinguishing it from sibling tools like start and status.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any prerequisites like checking if proxy is running.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/schwarztim/sec-ligolo-ng-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server