fill_deductions

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description discloses the tool is not yet implemented, but lacks details on expected behavior, authorization, side effects, or what happens upon call. With no annotations, more transparency is needed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence is concise and front-loaded with the implementation status. However, the description could be slightly more structured to separate the status note from the purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, and description does not explain return values or side effects. Missing guidance on how this tool fits with siblings (e.g., order of operations). Incomplete for a tool with two modes.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents parameters. Description 'Enter deduction information (standard or itemized)' adds no extra meaning beyond the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the verb 'Enter' and the resource 'deduction information,' specifying two modes (standard or itemized). It distinguishes from sibling tools like fill_1099_income or fill_w2_income which handle other tax sections.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, or when to choose standard vs itemized. The '[Phase 3 - Not yet implemented]' note indicates non-functionality but does not provide usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.