Submit Debeka Form

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already declare readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=true, and idempotentHint=false, so the description's emphasis on 'actually submitting' largely reinforces this rather than adding new behavioral insight. It does add a small extra behavioral detail by promising a success message or error details on return, which is useful given no output schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is brief and every sentence earns its place: the purpose, a necessary warning, and the return behavior. The warning is appropriately prominent for a destructive tool, and there is no redundant filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter tool, the description covers what it does, the destructive consequence, and the expected return format. It could be more explicit about the workflow prerequisite that the form must already be filled and documents uploaded, but the sibling tool names and the data-correctness warning provide enough implied guidance.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has zero properties and additionalProperties=false, so there are no parameters to document. A baseline of 4 is appropriate because the description cannot add meaning to parameters that do not exist.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb, 'Submits,' with a concrete resource, the 'Debeka Leistungsauftrag form.' This clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools like debeka_fill_credentials and decor_upload_documents, which handle preparation rather than final submission.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The warning 'Make sure all data is correct first' implies this is the final submission step and should not be run prematurely. However, it does not explicitly state that the agent should first run debeka_fill_credentials and debeka_upload_documents, nor does it name alternatives or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.