Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to ArchScript MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables planning and maintaining system architecture as typed, linted, live diagrams stored as files in the repo, with MCP tools for cataloging, creating, editing, linting, exporting, and viewing diagrams locally.
      8
      MIT
    • F
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP bridge to live SysML v1 models in CATIA Magic / Cameo Systems Modeler (No Magic MSoSA). Lets Claude Code or any MCP agent query, audit, and edit MBSE models — blocks, requirements, diagrams, parametrics, traceability — over a local, air-gapped connection.
      133
      4
      -
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to inspect and modify SketchUp models through a local authenticated bridge, covering entity creation and editing, geometry, materials, tags, cameras, scenes, transactions, snapshots, and file or view export. It also offers an optional full SketchUp Ruby API execution channel and batch operations for furniture, architectural, and analysis tasks.
      37
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables querying and modifying ArchiMate enterprise architecture models from XML or Archi Tool files via REST API and MCP server, supporting multiple simultaneous data sources.
      19 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, especially document CRUD versus export/render versus the guide. Some overlap exists: get_document, validate, and review all report diagnostics or metrics, and set_document_source versus edit_document both modify source, though their scopes differ.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Document operations mostly follow verb_noun naming such as list_documents, get_document, and create_document. However, export, validate, and review are bare verbs, while archscript_guide is an anomalous prefixed noun, making the overall convention mixed but still readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Ten tools is a well-scoped size for an architecture DSL server covering document lifecycle, editing, validation, review, export, rendering, and authoring guidance. No obvious tool feels redundant or trivially unnecessary.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers create/list/get/edit/validate/review/export/render plus a language guide, which is strong lifecycle coverage for ArchScript documents. Minor gaps include no document delete/close operation and no explicit open-by-file-path workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues